结论：iPad Pro 11 2025 M5 比许多紧凑型笔记本电脑更快新款 iPad Pro 11 2025 的速度比以前更快，新的 M5 SoC 使其比许多紧凑型笔记本电脑更强大。与全新 iPadOS 26 和 Magic Keyboard 相结合，iPad Pro 11 几乎变成了一台小型 MacBook。现在的操作系统比以往任何时候都更像 macOS，两个操作系统的融合其实只是时间问题。
Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG
Test device courtesy of Apple Deutschland
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
今年，Apple ，iPad Pro 还增加了 Wi-Fi 7 功能，即使与 MacBook 相比，可选的 5G 蜂窝调制解调器仍然是一个巨大的优势。它能让你保持连接，无需从智能手机等其他设备创建热点。显示屏仍然具有良好的图像质量，扬声器也很棒，电池续航时间也不错，尽管比上一代产品稍弱。
iPad Pro 11 2025 最大的问题仍然是价格，尤其是高端机型。如果你喜欢选配纳米纹理玻璃、5G 调制解调器甚至 Magic Keyboard 的机型，它很快就会让你花上 2000 美元。换句话说，你必须愿意并且能够负担得起。
Pros+ 极速 M5 SoC
+ 坚固耐用的外壳
+ Wi-Fi 7 和 5G
+ 作为平板电脑，相机质量良好
+ 强大的扬声器音效
+ 全面的软件包
+ 电池续航时间长
+ 明亮准确的显示屏Cons- 不含电源适配器
- 价格昂贵
- PWM 闪烁
- 无常亮显示
- 仅提供 12 个月保修
价格和供应情况我们的新款Apple iPad Pro 评测设备可直接从以下网站预购Apple.
Table of Contents结论：iPad Pro 11 2025 M5 比许多紧凑型笔记本电脑更快规格外壳和功能软件 - iPadOS 26通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 现配备 Wi-Fi 7照相机输入设备和操作显示屏 - 串联式 OLED 显示屏依然出色性能 -Apple M5，16 GB 内存排放 - 优秀扬声器电池运行时间Notebookcheck 总体评分可能的替代品比较
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types ← exclude selected tags
iPad Pro 再次成为首批配备新一代 M5 处理器的Apple 设备之一。此外，新款 iPad Pro 2025 终于支持 Wi-Fi 7。我们评测的是配备 1 TB SSD 和 5G 连接的较小尺寸 iPad Pro 11。Apple该配置的售价高达 1799 美元。Apple Pencil Pro 和 Magic Keyboard 分别再加 129 美元和 299 美元，总价高达 2227 美元。
规格
Apple iPad Pro 11 2025 (iPad Pro Series)ProcessorApple M5 (10 Cores), 4 x 4.6 GHz Apple M5 E-Core, 6 x 3.0 GHz Apple M5 E-CoreGraphics adapterApple M5 GPUMemory16 GB , LPDDR5Display11.00 inch 3:2, 2420 x 1668 pixel 267 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 HzStorage1 TB NAND Flash, 1024 GB , 968 GB freeConnections1 USB4 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness SensorNetworkingWi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 5.3 x 249.7 x 177.5Battery31.3 Wh, 8340 mAh Lithium-PolymerOperating SystemApple iPadOS 26CameraPrimary Camera: 12 MPix flash, f/1.8, AF, OIS, wide angleSecondary Camera: 12 MPix Ultra-wide angle, f/2.4Additional featuresSpeakers: 4 speakers, USB cable, 12 Months WarrantyWeight446 g
Price2079 EuroLinksApple homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
外壳和功能外壳本身没有变化。即使是 2025 机型，iPad Pro 11 依然延续了我们熟悉的高端设计，我们认为它看起来依然非常出色。铝合金一体成型机身外壳的稳定性极佳，长时间握持也非常舒适。背面的摄像头凸起非常平整，几乎看不出来。USB 端口仍然支持 4.0 标准，传输速度高达 40 Gbps。它还可以与 USB 供电的外接显示器以及连接的输入设备轻松配合使用。
价格方面，新款 iPad Pro 11 的起售价为 999 美元，存储容量为 256 GB（内存容量为 12 GB），比上市时的前代产品便宜 100 美元。特别是存储升级，价格仍然非常昂贵，2 TB 机型至少要 1999 美元。进一步的升级包括纳米纹理玻璃（100 美元）和 5G 移动模块（200 美元）。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
如果使用选配的 Magic Keyboard，你将获得一个完整的键盘和保护套，但结果是整体包装明显更厚（约 13 毫米）、更重（1.037 千克）。在下面两张图片中，我们将 iPad Pro 与当前的 MacBook Pro 14以及 MacBook Air M1.
iPad Pro 11 2025 M5 和 Magic Keyboard（左）与Apple MacBook Pro 14（右）
iPad Pro 11 2025 M5 和 Magic Keyboard（左）与Apple MacBook Air M1（右）
尺寸对比
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025 Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Apple iPad Pro 11 2025 Apple iPad Pro 11 2024 DIN A5 ❌
软件 - iPadOS 26新款 iPad Pro 11 2025 搭载的是第 26 版 iPadOS。Apple ，版本号与 macOS 同步，使用时一眼就能看出两者的相似之处。除了全新的 Liquid Glass 设计外，iPadOS 26 还有许多相似之处，包括 "设置 "菜单。iPadOS 26 还针对多任务进行了优化，这意味着现在可以更方便地在屏幕上并排或叠加多个窗口。在 11 英寸的小机型上，空间自然有限，但并排放置两个应用程序效果很好。
配备液体玻璃设计的 iPadOS 26
iPadOS 26 Exposé 视图
每个应用程序都允许你访问顶部的菜单栏，这又让人想起了 macOS，文件管理器还允许你快速访问外部驱动器。也许用不了多久，这两个操作系统就会完全融为一体。 Apple iPad Pro 也支持智能。
iPadOS 26 菜单栏
iPadOS 26 多任务功能可持续性Apple 为 iPad Pro 提供了一份全面的环境报告。该设备及其包装均使用了大量可回收材料。对于我们的 1 TB 存储机型，预计在设备的预期使用寿命内，碳足迹为 132 千克。传统上，iPad 的更新周期长达至少 5 年。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 现配备 Wi-Fi 7Apple 现在，iPad Pro 2025 配备了快速 Wi-Fi 7 模块和蓝牙 6。我们在评测时没有合适的路由器，但 Wi-Fi 6 的传输速度约为 1.8-1.9 Gbps，也比上一代产品略快。 前代产品.
我们的评测设备还提供了 5G 模块，并在出厂时配备了 T-Mobile eSIM 卡。与 MacBook 相比，这一功能仍是一大优势，因为 MacBook 总是需要访问热点（如手机）才能实现蜂窝连接。
NetworkingApple iPad Pro 11 2025Wi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1801 (min: 1751) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1857 (min: 1724) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Wi-Fi 6E iperf3 transmit AXE11000
970 (min: 946) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
981 (min: 963) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1827 (min: 1785) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1874 (min: 1677) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax iperf3 transmit AXE11000
959 (min: 713) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
951 (min: 839) MBit/s ∼51%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000
787 (min: 615) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1002 (min: 910) MBit/s ∼54%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2024Wi-Fi 6E iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
986 (min: 552) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1533 (min: 1422) MBit/s ∼82%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2025; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1800 (1751-1841) Apple iPad Pro 11 2025; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1857 (1724-1920)
照相机前置摄像头相机模块没有任何变化。配备 OIS 的后置 1200 万像素摄像头虽然达不到高端智能手机摄像头的质量，但对于平板电脑来说，它仍然能拍摄出出色的照片。视频录制也保持了 4K ProRes 和 60 Hz 的水准，麦克风也表现出色。前置摄像头（1200 万像素）支持 Face ID 和 Center Stage，这意味着即使你稍有移动，也能保持在画面中央。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
TreeHarbor basinHouseCanalclick to load imagesApple iPad Pro 11 2025 M5Honor Magic V30.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesApple iPad Pro 11 2025 M5Honor Magic V30.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesApple iPad Pro 11 2025 M5Honor Magic V30.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesApple iPad Pro 11 2025 M5Honor Magic V30.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
22.1 ∆E12.7 ∆E19.7 ∆E25.5 ∆E17.1 ∆E12.6 ∆E8.2 ∆E16 ∆E12.5 ∆E15.1 ∆E13 ∆E6.8 ∆E10.6 ∆E19.3 ∆E16.5 ∆E7.1 ∆E14.7 ∆E19 ∆E4.6 ∆E8.7 ∆E16.1 ∆E21.1 ∆E23.8 ∆E8.4 ∆EColorChecker Apple iPad Pro 11 2025: 14.62 ∆E min: 4.65 - max: 25.5 ∆E
Apple iPad Pro 11 2025
输入设备和操作电容式触摸屏和Apple Pencil Pro 仍然易于使用。它们可以实现精确的手写笔记，在创意应用程序中也表现出色。挤压前端的笔可以打开上下文菜单。此外，它还可以通过磁力吸附在平板电脑的右侧进行充电。
舒适的键盘和触控板
...和背光任何选择Apple Magic Keyboard 的用户都将获得一个带有触控板的键盘，这意味着可以使用鼠标指针控制 iPadOS。键盘本身带有背光，打字手感与 MacBook Pro 相似。
Magic Keyboard 上的 USB 端口
魔术键盘的开启角度...
...是有限的。显示屏 - 串联式 OLED 显示屏依然出色子像素排列
最大 HDR 亮度120 Hz 串联式 OLED 显示屏保持不变，但鉴于其出色的图像质量，这并不能成为批评的理由。在启用亮度传感器的 SDR 模式下，我们测得的亮度略低于 1,000 cd/m²（未启用传感器时为 600 cd/m²），而在 HDR 内容下最高可达 1,572 cd/m²。色彩还原也非常出色。可选配哑光纳米纹理玻璃（需额外支付 250 美元），这显然具有户外优势。不过，由于图像的亮度也会有所下降，因此你应该事先了解一下这个选项。我们测量到的 PWM 闪烁频率仍为 240 Hz，但在亮度超过 50%时采用了振幅较低的直流调光。
981cd/m²983cd/m²987cd/m²979cd/m²987cd/m²981cd/m²980cd/m²981cd/m²972cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 987 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 981.2 cd/m² Minimum: 0.9 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 98 %Center on Battery: 987 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.9 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}Gamma: 2.24CCT: 6506 K
Apple iPad Pro 11 2025OLED, 2420x1668, 11"Samsung Galaxy Tab S11OLED - Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2560x1600, 11"Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)IPS, 2456x1600, 11.5"Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025Tandem OLED, 2800x1840, 12.2"Apple iPad Pro 11 2024OLED, 2420x1668, 11"Screen-91%-109%-23%-1%Brightness middle (cd/m²)987946 -4%623 -37%1036 5%1005 2%Brightness (cd/m²)981938 -4%578 -41%1039 6%1004 2%Brightness Distribution (%)9896 -2%90 -8%94 -4%99 1%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.99Colorchecker dE 2000 *0.93.5 -289%2.9 -222%1.4 -56%0.92 -2%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *25.5 -175%5.3 -165%2.6 -30%2 -0%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.42.4 -71%3.9 -179%2.2 -57%1.5 -7%Gamma2.24 98%2.02 109%2.33 94%2.22 99%2.224 99%CCT6506 100%6322 103%7191 90%6829 95%6604 98%Contrast (:1)629* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 HzAmplitude: 44 % ≤ 88 % brightness settingThe display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 88 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.
The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8013 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
PWM (0 % 亮度)
PWM (25 % 亮度)
PWM (50 % 亮度)
PWM (75 % 亮度)
PWM (100 % 亮度)卡尔曼灰阶
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 色彩检查器
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对比 AdobeRGB
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White0.55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.3 ms rise↘ 0.25 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey0.38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.19 ms rise↘ 0.19 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms).
在阳光下
室外（阴天）
视角稳定性性能 -Apple M5，16 GB 内存Apple 继续为 iPad Pro 提供两个版本的 M5 SoC.基本型号（256 和 512 GB）提供 9 个内核（3 倍性能、6 倍效率），搭配 12 GB 内存。从 1 TB 存储容量开始，速度更快的 10 核版本（4 倍性能、6 倍效率）与 16 GB 内存搭配使用。
全新 M5 SoC 性能卓越，其纯性能也优于大多数紧凑型笔记本电脑。因此，即使在使用更复杂的应用程序、进行多任务处理和玩游戏时，操作也始终非常流畅、反应灵敏。与旧款 M4 型号CPU）和 GPU）分别提高了 10-15%和 10-30%。
Geekbench 6.5 | Antutu v10 | CrossMark | Geekbench AI Geekbench 6.5
Single-CoreAverage Apple M5 (10 Cores) (4128 - 4326, n=2)
4227 Points +2%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025Apple M5 (10 Cores), M5 GPU, 16384
4128 Points Apple iPad Pro 13 2024Apple M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 16384
3715 Points -10%Apple iPad Pro 11 2024Apple M4 (9 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 8192
3662 Points -11%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
2478 Points -40%Average of class Tablet (323 - 4128, n=95, last 2 years)
1584 Points -62%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
1517 Points -63%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
1311 Points -68% Multi-CoreAverage Apple M5 (10 Cores) (16544 - 18054, n=2)
17299 Points +5%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025Apple M5 (10 Cores), M5 GPU, 16384
16544 Points Apple iPad Pro 13 2024Apple M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 16384
14690 Points -11%Apple iPad Pro 11 2024Apple M4 (9 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 8192
13350 Points -19%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
7787 Points -53%Average of class Tablet (1104 - 16544, n=95, last 2 years)
5036 Points -70%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
4812 Points -71%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
3782 Points -77%Antutu v10 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2025Apple M5 (10 Cores), M5 GPU, 16384
3475590 Points Average Apple M5 (10 Cores) (n=1)
3475590 Points 0%Apple iPad Pro 13 2024Apple M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 16384
2716980 Points -22%Apple iPad Pro 11 2024Apple M4 (9 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 8192
2547454 Points -27%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
2396591 Points -31%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
1936538 Points -44%Average of class Tablet (235067 - 3475590, n=67, last 2 years)
1306387 Points -62%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
1049386 Points -70%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
805755 Points -77%CrossMark - Overall
Average Apple M5 (10 Cores) (2129 - 2426, n=2)
2278 Points +7%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025Apple M5 (10 Cores), M5 GPU, 16384
2129 Points Apple iPad Pro 13 2024Apple M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 16384
1944 Points -9%Apple iPad Pro 11 2024Apple M4 (9 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 8192
1880 Points -12%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
1585 Points -26%Average of class Tablet (319 - 2155, n=54, last 2 years)
1013 Points -52%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
Points -100%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
Points -100%Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5Average Apple M5 (10 Cores) (5295 - 5326, n=2)
5311 Points 0%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025Apple M5 (10 Cores), M5 GPU, 16384
5295 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
1143 Points -78%Average of class Tablet (166 - 5295, n=33, last 2 years)
645 Points -88%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
301 Points -94% Half Precision NPU 1.5Average Apple M5 (10 Cores) (41155 - 41298, n=2)
41227 Points 0%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025Apple M5 (10 Cores), M5 GPU, 16384
41155 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
9067 Points -78%Average of class Tablet (154 - 41155, n=33, last 2 years)
2980 Points -93%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
303 Points -99% Quantized NPU 1.5Average Apple M5 (10 Cores) (57388 - 57555, n=2)
57472 Points 0%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025Apple M5 (10 Cores), M5 GPU, 16384
57388 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
12422 Points -78%Average of class Tablet (88 - 57388, n=33, last 2 years)
4322 Points -92%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)HiSilicon Kirin T82, Maleoon 920c, 8192
657 Points -99%
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
11105 Points Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
8889 Points -20%Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
8457 Points -24%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6388 Points -42%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
5328 Points -52%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
900 Points -92%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
9391 Points Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
8689 Points -7%Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
7335 Points -22%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6353 Points -32%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
5137 Points -45%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
903 Points -90%3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
17650 Points Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
14922 Points -15%Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
14324 Points -19%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11564 Points -34%3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
22330 Points Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
15576 Points -30%Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
15083 Points -32%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11543 Points -48%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
4406 Points Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
3737 Points -15%Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
3265 (24.2min - 24.2max) Points -26%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2491 Points -43%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
2481 Points -44%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
433 Points -90%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
267 Points -94%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
4286 Points Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
3592 (26.6min - 26.6max) Points -16%Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
3583 Points -16%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
2615 Points -39%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2577 Points -40%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
437 Points -90%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
261 Points -94%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
120 fps +54%Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
120 fps +54%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +54%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
77.9 fps Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -23%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -23%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
885.9 fps Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
788 fps -11%Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
758.2 fps -14%Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
706.3 fps -20%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
697.9 fps -21%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
172 fps -81%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
120 fps +71%Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
120 fps +71%Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
120 fps +71%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +71%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
70 fps Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -24%GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
531.8 fps Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
530 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
511 fps -4%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
449.5 fps -15%Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
449.3 fps -16%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps -83%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
120 fps +57%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +57%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
118.3 fps +55%Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
106.2 fps +39%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
76.4 fps Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps -54%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
399.5 fps +98%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
359 fps +78%Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
351 fps +74%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
277 fps +38%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
201.4 fps Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps -67%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
117.9 fps +49%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps +31%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
94.5 fps +20%Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
84.1 fps +7%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
78.9 fps Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -76%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
283.9 fps +11%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
256.3 fps Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
233.8 fps -9%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
177 fps -31%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
171.4 fps -33%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -88%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
106.4 fps +60%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
97.3 fps +46%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88 fps +32%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
66.6 fps Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
60 fps -10%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -71%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -76%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
114.5 fps +3%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
110.7 fps Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
105.4 fps -5%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -19%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
77 fps -30%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps -76%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps -84%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
120 fps +80%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps +77%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
111 fps +66%Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
99.8 fps +49%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
66.8 fps Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -55%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps -60%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
339.7 fps +7%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
317.5 fps Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
287.9 fps -9%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
278.6 fps -12%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
233 fps -27%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps -77%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -85%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
55.1 fps +11%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
49.6 fps Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
48.6 fps -2%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -19%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
35.6 fps -28%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps -76%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.5 fps -85%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average Apple M5 (10 Cores) (395 - 457, n=2)
426 Points +8%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025
395 Points Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
333.7 Points -16%Apple iPad Pro 11 2024 (Safari 17)
329.398 Points -17%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 (Safari 16)
220.382 Points -44%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025 (Chrome 137, Performance Mode)
194.54 Points -51%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025 (Chrome 137)
129.817 Points -67%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) (Chrome 139)
171.344 Points -57%Average of class Tablet (35.8 - 395, n=67, last 2 years)
158.8 Points -60%Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Average Apple M5 (10 Cores) (790 - 946, n=2)
868 runs/min +10%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025
790 runs/min Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
572 runs/min -28%Apple iPad Pro 11 2024 (Safari 17)
571 runs/min -28%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 (Safari 16)
363 runs/min -54%Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 790, n=52, last 2 years)
220 runs/min -72%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) (Chrome 139)
194 runs/min -75%Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Average Apple M5 (10 Cores) (49.1 - 60.3, n=2)
54.7 runs/min +11%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025
49.1 runs/min Apple iPad Pro 11 2024 (Safari 17)
33.7 runs/min -31%Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
32 runs/min -35%Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 49.1, n=66, last 2 years)
14.4 runs/min -71%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) (Chrome 139)
12.4 runs/min -75%WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average Apple M5 (10 Cores) (376 - 384, n=2)
380 Points +1%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025
376 Points Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
315 Points -16%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140)
234 Points -38%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 (Safari 16)
223 Points -41%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) (Chrome 139)
152 Points -60%Average of class Tablet (39 - 376, n=69, last 2 years)
146.4 Points -61%Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Apple M5 (10 Cores) (138481 - 151342, n=2)
144912 Points +5%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025
138481 Points Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
105178 Points -24%Apple iPad Pro 11 2024 (Safari 17)
105035 Points -24%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140)
89374 Points -35%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 (Safari 16)
72484 Points -48%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) (Chrome 139)
48384 Points -65%Average of class Tablet (763 - 138481, n=89, last 2 years)
47209 Points -66%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (243 - 27101, n=78, last 2 years)
2310 ms * -852%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) (Chrome 139)
729.32 ms * -201%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 (Safari 16)
466.8 ms * -92%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140)
392.3 ms * -62%Apple iPad Pro 11 2024 (Safari 17)
325.6 ms * -34%Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
318.8 ms * -31%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025
242.7 ms * Average Apple M5 (10 Cores) (228 - 243, n=2)
235 ms * +3%* ... smaller is better
排放 - 优秀扬声器温度在日常使用中，iPad Pro 11 2025 的表面温度保持完全安全。设备在满载情况下（如玩游戏时）确实会明显发热，这意味着设备背面略高于 40°C 的温度并不是问题。大多数用户通常会使用保护套，这意味着温度会更低。
不过，性能并不是很稳定，新的 M5 SoC 只能在相对较短的时间内使用全部功率。这也导致在 3DMark 压力测试中性能大幅降低 20-30%。
Max. LoadIdle
36 °C37.5 °C36.4 °C 37.2 °C38.6 °C37.7 °C 35.1 °C36.8 °C35 °C
Maximum: 38.6 °CAverage: 36.7 °C
40.5 °C41.1 °C40.1 °C41.1 °C43.1 °C42 °C39.2 °C40.3 °C39.7 °C
Maximum: 43.1 °CAverage: 40.8 °C Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdle
24.3 °C24.5 °C24 °C 23.8 °C24 °C23.6 °C 23.6 °C23.6 °C23.5 °C
Maximum: 24.5 °CAverage: 23.9 °C
23.8 °C23.9 °C23.8 °C24.2 °C24.3 °C23.9 °C24.2 °C24.6 °C24.3 °C
Maximum: 24.6 °CAverage: 24.1 °C Room Temperature 20.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark 压力测试
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress TestHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % +51%Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
76.6 % +16%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66.7 % +1%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
65.9 % Solar Bay Stress Test StabilityApple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
92.6 % +32%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 % +9%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
69.9 % Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityHuawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.1 % +26%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)Maleoon 920c, Kirin T82, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % +26%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79.4 % +1%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
78.6 % Apple iPad Pro 11 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (9 cores), 256 GB NVMe
75.3 % -4%
负载下的表面温度（正面）
负载下的表面温度（后部）发言人 iPad Pro 11 2025 的四个扬声器再次提供了非常出色且颇具震撼力的音效。听音乐、看电影和玩游戏都非常惬意，外置扬声器并非必须。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Apple iPad Pro 11 2025 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.1% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (10.5% difference to median)Compared to same class» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 10% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (9.6% difference to median)Compared to same class» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (9.6% difference to median)Compared to same class» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2024 audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.9 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)Compared to same class» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 87% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池运行时间耗电量
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.14 / 0.34 WattIdle 1.97 / 3.01 / 3.05 Watt
Load
5.99 / 21.7 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Apple iPad Pro 11 20258340 mAhSamsung Galaxy Tab S118400 mAhHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)10100 mAhHuawei MatePad Pro 12.2 20255050 mAhApple iPad Pro 11 20248340 mAhAverage Apple M5 (10 Cores) Average of class Tablet Power Consumption-39%-79%35%-74%-156%-22%Idle Minimum * (Watt)1.972.57 -30%1.25 37%1.2 39%3.5 -78%2.04 ?(1.97 - 2.1, n=2) -4%2.06 ?(0.7 - 5.6, n=76, last 2 years) -5%Idle Average * (Watt)3.014.32 -44%7.1 -136%1.99 34%4.8 -59%7.31 ?(3.01 - 11.6, n=2) -143%4.13 ?(1.2 - 9.2, n=76, last 2 years) -37%Idle Maximum * (Watt)3.054.36 -43%7.27 -138%2.05 33%5.9 -93%7.38 ?(3.05 - 11.7, n=2) -142%4.48 ?(1.37 - 9.5, n=76, last 2 years) -47%Load Average * (Watt)5.9912.54 -109%15.6 -160%28.5 ?(5.99 - 51.1, n=2) -376%9.51 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=68, last 2 years) -59%Load Maximum * (Watt)21.715.49 29%17.6 19%46.6 ?(21.7 - 71.5, n=2) -115%13.8 ?(5.7 - 41.6, n=68, last 2 years) 36%* ... smaller is better
功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Apple iPad Pro 11 2025; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.59 (2.13-41.2) Apple iPad Pro 11 2025; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.53 (2.47-3.06)
功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
Apple iPad Pro 11 2025; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø24.7 (12.4-34.5) Apple iPad Pro 11 2025; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.53 (2.47-3.06)
电池寿命正如我们已经看到的，新的 M5 处理器在短时间负载时会消耗大量电能，这也影响了我们的 Wi-Fi 测试。在亮度调节的情况下，我们测得的耗电量约为 12 小时，而在亮度全开的情况下则略高于 8 小时。我们使用前代产品和入门级 M4 SoC（9 核而非 10 核）进行的测试显示，Wi-Fi 测试的运行时间约为 15 小时。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
13h 25min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
8h 11min
Apple iPad Pro 11 20258340 mAhSamsung Galaxy Tab S118400 mAhHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)10100 mAhHuawei MatePad Pro 12.2 20255050 mAhApple iPad Pro 11 20248340 mAhBattery Runtime-16%28%-7%13% WiFi Websurfing (h)13.411.2 -16%17.2 28%12.4 -7%15.2 13% WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (h)8.2
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Back to the verdict
Apple iPad Pro 11 2025
- 10/24/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Chassis87 / 98 → 89%
Keyboard77 / 80 → 97%
Pointing Device97%
Connectivity54 / 69 → 79%
Weight84 / 40-88 → 92%
Battery90%
Display92%
Games Performance49 / 65 → 75%
Application Performance97 / 92 → 100%
AI Performance93%
Temperature91%
Noise100%
Audio86 / 91 → 94%
Camera70 / 90 → 78%
Average82%
90%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions80.2%Materials80%Packaging95%Power Use92.7%Repairability50%Software Updates85% Total Sustainability Score: 80.5%
可能的替代品比较
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightDriveDisplay
1.90.2%Apple iPad Pro 11 2025Apple M5 (10 Cores) ⎘ Apple M5 GPU ⎘16 GB Memory, 1024 GBAmazon: 1. Apple iPad 11-inch: A16 chip...2. Ailun Screen Protector for i...3. Stylus Pen for iPad 6th-11th...List Price: 2079€446 g1 TB NAND Flash11.00"2420x1668267 PPIOLED
2.88.2%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘12 GB Memory, 128 GB Amazon: 1. Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 128 G...2. Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 256 G...3. Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra...List Price: 899€469 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash11.00"2560x1600274 PPIOLED - Dynamic AMOLED 2X
3.81.2%Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)HiSilicon Kirin T82 ⎘ HiSilicon Maleoon 920c ⎘8 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: 1. Compatible with Huawei MateP...2. Compatible with Huawei MateP...3. HUOLUNGJIN Tablets Case Comp...515 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash11.50"2456x1600255 PPIIPS
4.85.4%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025HiSilicon Kirin T92 ⎘ HiSilicon Maleoon 920 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: 1. Shantime Tablet Case and Sta...2. Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass...3. Rotating Case for Huawei Mat...List Price: 999€508 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.20"2800x1840275 PPITandem OLED
5.93.2% v7 (old)Apple iPad Pro 11 2024Apple M4 (9 cores) ⎘ Apple M4 10-core GPU ⎘8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMeAmazon: List Price: 1199€444 g256 GB NVMe11.00"2420x1668267 PPIOLED
More articles related to this deviceApple iPad Pro 11 2025 (iPad Pro Series)News•Apple iFixit 拆解 iPad Pro M5 |News•AppleiPad Pro M5 可通过一些配件取代笔记本电脑，并受益于 5G 技术 |News•Apple 在即将推出的搭载 M4 处理器的 Mac 产品系列中大幅增加内存 |Review•Apple iPad Pro 11 2024 平板电脑评测--更轻、更薄、快如闪电 |Review•Apple M4 SoC 分析--AMD、英特尔和高通公司目前没有机会 |News•哎哟：Apple 新款 iPad Pro 2024 与前代产品的两段耐用性和弯曲测试视频对比 |News•采用液氮冷却技术的 iPad Pro 凭借Apple M4 达到基准记录 |News•Apple 将首先推出配备 OLED 显示屏的 iPad，而不是可折叠 iPad |Review•Apple iPad Pro 12.9（2022）评测。巨大的平板电脑现在使用M2 SoC运行Apple |Review•Apple iPad Pro 11（2022）平板电脑。 "的创意工具的另一个动力提升Apple |Review•苹果iPad Pro 11 2020款平板电脑评测：这才是升级应该有的样子 |Review•苹果iPad Pro 12.9（2018款，LTE版，256 GB）平板电脑评测 |Review•苹果iPad Pro 11（2018款，Wi-Fi版，64 GB）平板电脑评测 |Review•苹果 iPad Pro 12.9 (2017) 平板电脑简短评测 |Review•苹果 iPad Pro 10.5 平板电脑简短评测 |Review•Apple iPad Pro 9.7 平板电脑简短评测 |Review•Apple iPad Pro 平板电脑简短评测
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Please share our article, every link counts!
Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 176 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 713345 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via: